Connect with us

Home

“Judge’s Ruling May Cost Trump’s Attendance at his son’s Barron’s High School Graduation”

Published

on

New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan has not made a decision regarding Donald Trump’s request to attend his son Barron Trump’s high school graduation instead of appearing in court on that particular day.

As the criminal trial initiated on Monday, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, brought forth charges against Trump, alleging 34 felonies related to falsifying business records regarding payments to Stormy Daniels, a porn star. Contrary to misconceptions, Trump is not accused of “covering up a sex scandal.” Trump adamantly denies all allegations, but a conviction could result in jail time.

As the trial progresses with jury selection underway, Trump’s legal team has made a plea for him to be excused from court on May 17. The reason? To attend his son Barron’s high school graduation in Florida, his home state. While acknowledging the request the judge has yet to render a decision

https://twitter.com/JasonMillerinDC/status/1779914396459753743?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1779914396459753743%7Ctwgr%5Ee8c638f22169beb492c4692c8efcabe7659370a0%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Fpolitics%2F2024%2F04%2F15%2Fjudge-may-force-trump-skip-son-barrons-high-school-graduation%2F

Speaking to reporters before entering the courtroom in New York on Monday, Trump labeled the trial as a case of “political prosecution” and emphasized that “nothing like this has ever happened before.” He mentioned that even legal experts who are not necessarily his supporters have stated that there is no case here.

Trump reiterated that the case was brought forward as political persecution, describing it as an unprecedented persecution. He further argued that the case should not have been brought in the first place, calling it an assault on America. He also claimed that the country is being run by an incompetent man who is involved in the case.

“This is truly an attack on a political opponent,” Trump concluded. He expressed his pride in being present, considering the situation an honor.

Follow us for more news.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home

Alina Habba: They are prosecuting Trump because the can’t win the Elections

Published

on

Alina Habba, a lawyer and spokesperson for former President Donald Trump, alleged that Democrats are targeting the Republican presidential nominee in court because they are unable to defeat him through electoral means.

“The fact that we have two courts, not one — criminal and civil — being used against one man because they cannot beat him in the polls is a disgrace to the American judicial system,” she said in remarks at the New York State Supreme Court Building in Manhattan after opening arguments in the hush money case.

Habba mentioned that she had recently attended another court session where Trump faced accusations of inflating his asset values to obtain advantageous loans, which he has since repaid. Initially, he was instructed to post a $454 million bond before appealing, but an appellate court later reduced it to $175 million. On Monday, New York Judge Arthur Engoron approved this bond, effectively preventing New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, from seizing his assets while the case is under appeal.

Habba accused Engoron of not understanding “basic principles of financing” and said he and James “had no idea what they were talking about.”

“I am sick of coming in front of the press and saying this, but you have to because you people need to understand what is going on. God forbid you put an accounting thing in for ‘legal counsel.’ … Because they’re afraid of 2024. And you know what? They should be because the American people are not stupid. They see what’s going on,” she said.

Continue Reading

Home

The Charade of Donald’s Trump Hush Money Trial Begins with All Jurors Selected

Published

on

Opening statements in the Manhattan trial of ex-President Donald Trump’s hush money case are for Monday, following the selection of a full jury of 12 members and six alternates on Friday.

Trump took to social media the night before, posting on Truth Social:

“Four years ago I was a very successful and popular President of the United States and, in November, went into an Election where I received more votes, by far, than any sitting President in the history of our Country. Unfortunately, the Election were Rigged and Stolen, and our once great Country has quickly become a Nation In Serious Decline. Tomorrow morning I report to a New York Criminal Court for a Trial on, somewhat ironically, ELECTION INTERFERENCE, ruled over by Crooked Joe Biden’s DOJ, before a Corrupt and Highly Conflicted Judge, a failed Soros funded District Attorney who didn’t want to bring this case, which could have been brought eight years ago, but wasn’t, in an almost completely Democrat District. Virtually every Legal Scholar and Expert says that there is NO CASE, NO CRIME, NO NOTHING! IT IS A SHAM THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN BROUGHT, EXCEPT TO TRY AND DAMAGE BIDEN’S POLITICAL OPPONENT, ME. SEE YOU TOMORROW MORNING!”

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, has brought forth 34 felony charges against Trump, accusing him of falsifying business records. These charges stem from an alleged attempt to conceal a $130,000 hush money payment, facilitated by his then-lawyer Michael Cohen, to adult actress Stormy Daniels prior to the 2016 election.

Bragg asserts that Trump’s classification of the payment as a legal fee was an effort to mask violations of campaign finance laws, elevating the offense to a felony rather than a mere regulatory infraction that might result in a fine. The jury, composed of seven men and five women, will ultimately determine the persuasiveness of this argument.


After a week-long selection process involving thorough questioning about potential biases and their ability to remain fair and impartial, the jurors and alternates were chosen. This process was crucial given the high-profile nature of the case, which also carries implications for the upcoming 2024 presidential election. With Trump currently leading in crucial swing states, the jury’s impartiality becomes all the more significant.

We are waiting to see where this charade goes

Continue Reading

Home

Republicans want to defend America and to ban the foreign aid help because Democrats wont do it

Published

on

A GOP lawmaker aims to limit the presence of foreign flags in the House chamber following Democrats’ waving of the Ukrainian flag in celebration of the $60.84 billion aid legislation passage. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) rebuked the display, calling it a breach of decorum. Now, Republicans are drafting legislation to ban the display of foreign flags on the floor entirely.

“Watching American representatives pass out & wave Ukrainian flags in the United States House of Representatives chamber infuriated me,” Rep. Kat Cammack (R-FL) said in a post on X. “If there is one room in our country that should only have the American flag present, it is this room.”

The timing for bringing the legislation to the floor remains uncertain, but Cammack’s team is currently drafting the text. Representatives won’t reconvene until April 29. Some lawmakers expressed dismay over the Ukrainian flag display, leading to a tense moment when Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) urged Democrats to “put those damn flags away” during votes.

Johnson also admonished members, later issuing a statement referring to a “disturbance on the House floor.”

“In these extraordinary times, both in the House and globally, it’s crucial to maintain decorum,” Johnson remarked. “We should only wave one flag on the House floor, and I believe we all know which flag that is.”

Democrats defended their celebration, with some even engaging with pro-Ukrainian protesters post-vote. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) expressed gratitude to many in the crowd for their support.

A list of possible co-sponsors for Cammack’s bill is not yet known, although a handful of House Republicans criticized Democrats for the move, indicating substantial support among rank-and-file GOP lawmakers.

“Shouldn’t have any other flag but the American flag on the House floor,” Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) said. “That’s ridiculous. … It’s inappropriate. It’s just lack of order.”

Continue Reading

Latest Posts:

January 2025
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.