Connect with us

News

Exclusive: Mike Johnson on Corporate Interests in Ukraine Conflict

Published

on

The inside story of how House Speaker Mike Johnson’s stance on Ukraine aid was influenced starts with his top policy adviser, Dan Ziegler, a former lobbyist. Ziegler’s clients included major companies with corporate statements indicating some interest in the war. Before joining Johnson’s team, Ziegler was a lobbyist at Williams & Jensen, representing companies that have made public statements about the war in Ukraine. This raises questions about the Speaker’s management and handling of major legislative proposals.

Ziegler’s lobbying activities also involved the News Media Alliance, which pushed for the controversial Journalism Competition & Preservation Act (JCPA). The presence of other staffers with questionable backgrounds further complicates Johnson’s leadership.

The Speaker’s authorization of attacks on conservatives aligned with former President Donald Trump, as well as the public support from allies like Rep. Michael McCaul, demonstrate Johnson’s determination to push this agenda. McCaul’s attack on Sen. J.D. Vance illustrates the division within the Republican Party on this issue.

Meet the Men Who Flip-Flopped Johnson

In a surprising turn of events, Speaker Johnson’s stance on providing aide to Ukraine has undergone a significant transformation. Initially, he was against allocating funds for Ukraine’s defense, as seen in his opposition to the $47 billion designated for the purpose. He even supported an amendment to strip $300 million from the Pentagon Appropriations package last year. However, recently, Speaker Johnson has shifted his position, now advocating for the provision of more than $48 billion in aide to Ukraine.

This dramatic change can be attributed to the influence of his top two advisers, Policy Director Dan Ziegler and National Security Adviser Josh Hodges. According to sources familiar with the matter, these two aides have been instrumental in persuading Speaker Johnson to change his stance on Ukraine aide.

The shift in Speaker Johnson’s policy direction raises questions about the decision-making process within his office. The swift change from opposing aide to supporting a significant increase in funding has left many wondering about the factors that led to this decision. The fact that the process for passing the bill was conducted behind closed doors and rushed through without proper debate or amendment has only added to the confusion.

As the Speaker’s office navigates this complex issue, it remains to be seen how this change in policy will impact the political landscape and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

Speaker Johnson’s policy change on Ukraine aide since becoming Speaker and hiring Ziegler and Hodges as top advisers is marked by a shift in strategy that has led to a complex legislative process. This change has included retracting promises made to conservatives in order to secure the speaker’s gavel. The proposed legislation, which includes tens of billions in aid to Ukraine, is likely to only pass the House with significant Democratic support, as it has incited anger and opposition from conservative lawmakers.

Critics accuse Johnson of prioritizing Ukraine’s border over America’s southern border and pushing President Joe Biden’s agenda. Some sources familiar with the situation have expressed dissatisfaction with the performance of Ziegler and Hodges, suggesting that their advice has not been beneficial for the Republican Conference or the American people.

It has been brought to the attention of House members that Dan Ziegler and Josh Hodges, two key advisers to Speaker Mike Johnson, have been making questionable decisions both strategically and substantively. Raj Shah, the Speaker’s deputy chief of staff for communications, has not provided any on-the-record commentary or answered detailed questions regarding Ziegler and Hodges.

Shah’s background includes working at the RNC, followed by a stint in the Trump White House as a spokesperson. During this time, he occasionally served as a backup for then-Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders. He later left the White House to work at Fox Corporation alongside former House Speaker Paul Ryan. Shah’s communications were mentioned in the legal dispute between Fox News and Dominion, where he was listed as a top official alongside Ryan.

Shah has emerged as a key enforcer of Johnson’s communications structure, blocking and tackling any criticisms that come at the Speaker from the right. On his account on X–the platform formerly known as Twitter–Shah has in recent days elevated several Never Trump establishment Republicans who have backed Johnson amid criticisms from Greene and Massie among others. Shah has promoted the following messages from people including Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and Utah Gov. Spencer Cox:

Trump’s history with Kemp is very contentious and widely known, but Cox is perhaps even worse of a Never Trumper. Even just a couple months ago in mid-February, when Trump had already won the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary just before the South Carolina primary, Cox said it would be a “huge mistake” for Republicans to nominate Trump for president in 2024. Trump would obviously go on to decimate former United States ambassador to the United Nations and former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley in her own state and on Super Tuesday, winning the nomination. But Cox remains adamantly critical of Trump.

Home

Alina Habba: They are prosecuting Trump because the can’t win the Elections

Published

on

Alina Habba, a lawyer and spokesperson for former President Donald Trump, alleged that Democrats are targeting the Republican presidential nominee in court because they are unable to defeat him through electoral means.

“The fact that we have two courts, not one — criminal and civil — being used against one man because they cannot beat him in the polls is a disgrace to the American judicial system,” she said in remarks at the New York State Supreme Court Building in Manhattan after opening arguments in the hush money case.

Habba mentioned that she had recently attended another court session where Trump faced accusations of inflating his asset values to obtain advantageous loans, which he has since repaid. Initially, he was instructed to post a $454 million bond before appealing, but an appellate court later reduced it to $175 million. On Monday, New York Judge Arthur Engoron approved this bond, effectively preventing New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, from seizing his assets while the case is under appeal.

Habba accused Engoron of not understanding “basic principles of financing” and said he and James “had no idea what they were talking about.”

“I am sick of coming in front of the press and saying this, but you have to because you people need to understand what is going on. God forbid you put an accounting thing in for ‘legal counsel.’ … Because they’re afraid of 2024. And you know what? They should be because the American people are not stupid. They see what’s going on,” she said.

Continue Reading

Home

The Charade of Donald’s Trump Hush Money Trial Begins with All Jurors Selected

Published

on

Opening statements in the Manhattan trial of ex-President Donald Trump’s hush money case are for Monday, following the selection of a full jury of 12 members and six alternates on Friday.

Trump took to social media the night before, posting on Truth Social:

“Four years ago I was a very successful and popular President of the United States and, in November, went into an Election where I received more votes, by far, than any sitting President in the history of our Country. Unfortunately, the Election were Rigged and Stolen, and our once great Country has quickly become a Nation In Serious Decline. Tomorrow morning I report to a New York Criminal Court for a Trial on, somewhat ironically, ELECTION INTERFERENCE, ruled over by Crooked Joe Biden’s DOJ, before a Corrupt and Highly Conflicted Judge, a failed Soros funded District Attorney who didn’t want to bring this case, which could have been brought eight years ago, but wasn’t, in an almost completely Democrat District. Virtually every Legal Scholar and Expert says that there is NO CASE, NO CRIME, NO NOTHING! IT IS A SHAM THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN BROUGHT, EXCEPT TO TRY AND DAMAGE BIDEN’S POLITICAL OPPONENT, ME. SEE YOU TOMORROW MORNING!”

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, has brought forth 34 felony charges against Trump, accusing him of falsifying business records. These charges stem from an alleged attempt to conceal a $130,000 hush money payment, facilitated by his then-lawyer Michael Cohen, to adult actress Stormy Daniels prior to the 2016 election.

Bragg asserts that Trump’s classification of the payment as a legal fee was an effort to mask violations of campaign finance laws, elevating the offense to a felony rather than a mere regulatory infraction that might result in a fine. The jury, composed of seven men and five women, will ultimately determine the persuasiveness of this argument.


After a week-long selection process involving thorough questioning about potential biases and their ability to remain fair and impartial, the jurors and alternates were chosen. This process was crucial given the high-profile nature of the case, which also carries implications for the upcoming 2024 presidential election. With Trump currently leading in crucial swing states, the jury’s impartiality becomes all the more significant.

We are waiting to see where this charade goes

Continue Reading

Home

Republicans want to defend America and to ban the foreign aid help because Democrats wont do it

Published

on

A GOP lawmaker aims to limit the presence of foreign flags in the House chamber following Democrats’ waving of the Ukrainian flag in celebration of the $60.84 billion aid legislation passage. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) rebuked the display, calling it a breach of decorum. Now, Republicans are drafting legislation to ban the display of foreign flags on the floor entirely.

“Watching American representatives pass out & wave Ukrainian flags in the United States House of Representatives chamber infuriated me,” Rep. Kat Cammack (R-FL) said in a post on X. “If there is one room in our country that should only have the American flag present, it is this room.”

The timing for bringing the legislation to the floor remains uncertain, but Cammack’s team is currently drafting the text. Representatives won’t reconvene until April 29. Some lawmakers expressed dismay over the Ukrainian flag display, leading to a tense moment when Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) urged Democrats to “put those damn flags away” during votes.

Johnson also admonished members, later issuing a statement referring to a “disturbance on the House floor.”

“In these extraordinary times, both in the House and globally, it’s crucial to maintain decorum,” Johnson remarked. “We should only wave one flag on the House floor, and I believe we all know which flag that is.”

Democrats defended their celebration, with some even engaging with pro-Ukrainian protesters post-vote. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) expressed gratitude to many in the crowd for their support.

A list of possible co-sponsors for Cammack’s bill is not yet known, although a handful of House Republicans criticized Democrats for the move, indicating substantial support among rank-and-file GOP lawmakers.

“Shouldn’t have any other flag but the American flag on the House floor,” Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) said. “That’s ridiculous. … It’s inappropriate. It’s just lack of order.”

Continue Reading

Latest Posts:

February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.